United Brethren has retired.

Of world religions...

Will Mormonism be a "world religion", and if not, do we care?

Like all good Mormon topics, this one has already been thrashed out at T&S, but wouldn't you like the opinion of an "international Mormon" (say yes)? Plus, with the Joseph Smith conference, this topic is once again current.

The question of what is and what isn't a world religion is a thorny matter. Is size all-important, or do other factors come into play? To get a sense of this, ask yourself whether Catholicism is a world religion, or is it subsumed under Christianity? Tough one, huh?

According to Douglas Davies, the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints has the potential to be a "globally present religion", but not a world religion. In short we are too centrally-controlled, too dependent on one culture. This will come as a disappointment to many Latter-Day Saints who wear Rodney Stark's famous prediction as a badge of honour. But in reality, this is just a semantic game: what Mormons focus on is the potential for church growth. Whether or not the Church is a world religion or a globally present religion, is not important. Only size matters.

(At the conference Gerald McDermott popped this balloon a little too, gleefully reminding all and sundry that the Jehovah Witnesses--the JW's!--are bigger and more successful than we are.)

"If Mormons want to be a World Religion," Davies stated, "they have to make some changes." He suggested a process of de-Americanization (or de-Utahification?) and de-centralization. Perhaps we can imagine a time when the church in each country has its own governing body (led by a local Area Authority) and is given a certain autonomy in adjusting the Church programme (not doctrine) to local mores.

Roger Keller's objection to this suggestion was that it assumed that the Church should adjust to popular models. "This is the Church of God," he testified, "led by authorized leaders." In other words, we will not be moved.

All of this is a great misunderstanding. Davies did not suggest that Church has to adjust, only that it should if it wants to be a world religion. But we just want growth, not to fit some academic model. It was just a little deflating to many in the audience to hear Rodney Stark challenged so, er, starkly. (Bad, I know.)

Comments

Blogger Dave said ... (May 11, 2005 2:56 AM) 

Alas, I didn't make the conference, nor did I manage to watch any of it online. It strikes me that "you're not a real world religion" is just an academic version of "you're not a real Christian denomination." A more precise statement would be: "You don't match up with my definition of a world religion." Okay--so what?

 

Blogger Ronan said ... (May 11, 2005 8:06 AM) 

One could argue that what hinders us is that we're *too* Christian. A world religion has to be obviously different than others. It seems that we choose not to stress what makes us different.

 

Blogger Ronan said ... (May 11, 2005 8:07 AM) 

John C:

It depends on whether local Area Authorities can act on their own or if they're just agents of SLC.

 

Blogger Ronan said ... (May 12, 2005 3:06 PM) 

Intern,
I don't understand your point. Clearly, UK education is sorely lacking.

 

Blogger Ronan said ... (May 18, 2005 3:49 PM) 

good summation, r.
and todd, i appreciate your comment and it summarised nicely the heart of the issue: we'll take thin over thick, thanks!

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (May 24, 2005 12:02 AM) 

Todd, that business about death conquest -- I really don't think he meant that to be one of the defining characteristics of a world religion! He just brought that up as one interesting driver of Mormon growth, because we are particularly good at death conquest. 

Posted by Ben H

 

Anonymous Anonymous said ... (May 25, 2005 8:22 PM) 

Ben,
Death conquest is indeed required for Davies's world religion status. You can listen to his speech here:
http://www.lds.org/library/display/0,4945,510-1-3067-1,00.html

He defines a world religion about one third of the way though his talk. 

Posted by Todd H

 

post a comment